Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99
*Sigh* I am not misinterpreting anything. You rant about unwilling Ukrainians being killed yet you cannot say what should happen to stop it. I think most here would express an opinion on what should happen next.
I think what you don't say, says everything.
|
This was not said in the post you quoted.
Quote:
|
You clearly have a problem with the Ukrainian's fighting for their country
|
Nor this in the post quoted:
Quote:
|
Another post where you criticise the current Ukrainian strategy
|
You may be overdosing on the pro-Ukranian kool aid and believe recapturing Crimea is achievable, and happy to commit the Ukrainian male population to die for it.
However somewhere else (in the real world) there has to be consideration of at least the possibility for some that dying in an ill equipped, never ending and futile war isn’t any more desirable for the average Ukrainians than it is for you from the luxury of your keyboard. How they would extract themselves from that is a good question. I refer again to Pierre’s post that you have not addressed while you persist in misrepresenting mine.
Under Zelensky, they’d need to kill him first.
---------- Post added at 10:27 ---------- Previous post was at 10:22 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
Comrade* Haw-Haw, a bogey man is imaginary - Russia’s actions in Chechnya, Georgia, Transnistria, & Ukraine are very real…
*Tankies don’t believe in Lords…
|
For the purposes of this post only, I’ll concede the point and say it
still doesn’t warrant sacrificing every Ukrainian man of fighting age in a war it is both losing and being inadequately resourced by its supposed allies.
What steps Ukraine, NATO, or anyone else could take between now and then to better resource the front line more than ritual human sacrifice would be welcome.