View Single Post
Old 17-02-2024, 23:13   #5929
Hugh
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
 
Hugh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 68
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 43,750
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Re: Britain outside the EU

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman View Post
They paid in, yes, and the Government (broadly) consistently spent more than it took in year on year. There's no side pot to pay for their pensions or social care. It's a fallacy.

The average person retiring at 66, and living to 81 (UK life expectancy), will take £166,000 back out in state pension. Or about 5 times the average salary.

The average earner pays £2,000 a year in national insurance. Or through their working life to "pay in" £90,000-100k even if we pretended that such a side pot did exist.

The whole thing is a ponzi scheme - only without more people to pay in (by having kids, or migration) it's inevitably going to collapse. The only question is which generations that burden falls to. And we haven't even touched social care.
Why compare something paid out over 15 years against something earned in one year?
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.

If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Hugh is offline   Reply With Quote