View Single Post
Old 06-02-2024, 12:15   #179
mrmistoffelees
067
 
mrmistoffelees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Middlesbrough
Age: 49
Services: Many
Posts: 5,034
mrmistoffelees has a nice shiny star
mrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny star
Re: Online Safety Bill

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter View Post
The mother of murdered teenager Brianna Ghey is calling for restrictions on mobile phones for under 16's.

She wants them to only be able to have basic phones or child smartphones that don't give access to social media.

On the last Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme a Government spokeswoman said that she thought that an outright ban would be draconian, but that a ban at school would be sensible.

This link contains a link to the petition should anyone wish to sign it:

https://www.warringtonguardian.co.uk...one-age-limit/

This was also discussed on the Jeremy Vine shoe this morning where there was a call for more regulation of user to user sites because all they are interested in is continued increased usage and not the welfare of vulnerable people.
Oh god yet another load of spazamataz

Most phones are bought for children by their parents in the first place

Social media can be blocked using controls that are supplied by providers such as Vodafone

People should learn that they don’t get everything handed to them on a plate and quelle surprise here we go again it’s about personal responsibilities the it’s always someone else’s fault/responsibility is quite frankly ridiculous
__________________
Nerves of steel, heart of gold, knob of butter......
mrmistoffelees is offline   Reply With Quote