View Single Post
Old 26-01-2024, 10:42   #5813
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,247
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Britain outside the EU

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth View Post
About the hormone treated Canadian beef: do you want that or not?
Badenoch has ruled it out. It can't get into the UK food supply chain as it would be problematical for Northern Ireland's borders with GB and IE.

---------- Post added at 10:42 ---------- Previous post was at 10:29 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth View Post
It certainly highlights a problem with specific countries after Brexit. But surely not "all".

The trade-off for Brexit is sovereignty vs the EU umbrella. As we chose sovereignty, all we need is a competent government.
I think a key issue is that the trade deals are not rolled over indefinitely. As we're a smaller player than the EU, we stand a chance of getting a poorer deal or no deal at all (hopefully less common) when they're up for renegotiation. In terms of what we can offer in trade deals to other countries, our hands are tied due to the need to have no border between Northern Ireland and GB and Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. The sovereignty box may be ticked but the reality on the ground is somewhat different.

Last edited by 1andrew1; 26-01-2024 at 10:52.
1andrew1 is offline   Reply With Quote