Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
That's not correct. I've asked people who have reached a conclusion (Israel's doing wrong) to wind back to zero Palestinian casualties and then what should Israel has done.
Ian has offered woolly, fluffy answers with no anchor in reality.
You've never answered my question. So, I'll ask it again with some added context:
Hamas has invaded Israel and brutally murdered 1200 people in the most barbaric manner. At that point, what should Israel have done given that Hamas hides among the civilian population?
|
I'm not persisting in playing your games where you casually dismiss clear answers that do not confirm your own view. I and others have explained our clear positions on a number of occasions.
It's today, there's a humanitarian crisis hitting over a million displaced people. Estimates vary between 12,000 and 20,000 dead, mostly women and children. The Palestinian ambassador to the United Nations claims Israel's true ambition is ethnic cleansing, and accused them of enacting genocide among other war crimes. Other opinions are available. However, how many Palestinian civilian deaths do you think are "too many" aspiring to "eliminate" a terrorist organisation of less than 20,000 members?