Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
Save another generation from Brussels.
To answer Roughie's question:
Brexit is defined for me as gaining sovereignty so as not to be governed by a foreign entity.
Then, an investment friendly government can help industry to build prosperity.
Definition is very simple; execution needs competence.
[COLOR="Silver"]
|
1. Some might argue that given that a proportionate number of elected decision makers and appointed Brussels civil servants were British, we weren't governed by a foreign entity.
2. How did that technical gain in sovereignty actually translate into having more control over the destiny of the country? For example. did that mean that we could get better trade deals than we did through the EU? I know it's early days, and Moggy's 50 years aren't up yet, but have Mr and Mrs Soap seen positive outcomes from this increase in sovereignty?
3. Did we need to leave the EU for an investment wizard to make the country prosperous? After all, up until the global crash of 2008, it could be argued that the outcomes of Labour's investment in people and things were improved by access to the Single Market and other EU institutions..