[Sephiroth]

@Roughbeast

We agree to disagree. I haven't the time to answer you point by point any more. We're going round in circles anyway.

You accuse me of being 'selective' on the historical points. No more so than you - and going back hundreds of years, bearing in mind how societies have evolved, is pointless unless it shows how we got to where we are today.


---------- Post added at 12:32 ---------- Previous post was at 12:22 ----------

Originally Posted by roughbeast

<SNIP>

5. I see you have had a go at the left and at liberals poorly stereotyping them as unable to distinguish between male and female. ....

<SNIP>

I can't let that one go.

Starmer and Cooper (Labour) could/would not define a 'woman'; Moran (Lib-Dem) likewise. She actually said:

“a woman is a gender, it is a way to self-identify and there are lots of genders. There is male and that is biological. There is female, which is also biological. A woman is a gender identity which is more akin to being a man. Those are the opposites and then there is also non-binary, which is people who don’t identify with either.”

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...-suzanne-moore