Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
That’s the wrong question. The correct question is whether it is right, on a point of principle, for certain legislative decisions to be taken by a supra-national body over which we have (had) extremely limited democratic influence.
Your question speaks to the competence (or otherwise) of those who have held re-patriated powers for the past 3 years (give or take), which is an interesting, but quite different, party political discussion.
|
What you are doing, like Seph before you, is celebrating the questionably advantageous gain in sovereignty without the context of said gain against a backdrop of massive damage to the country.
The merit or not of said gain can only be valued when you look at the entire journey. History will judge that there is no advantageous gain, quite the opposite.
---------- Post added at 15:03 ---------- Previous post was at 15:01 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone
No not a rant, but the plain old truth...
|
I'd ignore him, he only cares about the ideology, nothing more.