Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
What's missing from John's thinking is any parallel with WW2 and the fight against the Nazis.
Britain had to fight Germany in its self defence. Innocent people died on both sides, but that kind of war brings that kind of consequence.
It's no different with Israel vs Hamas. The Germans voted for Hitler in 1933 and there was never another vote. Palestinians in Gaza voted for Hamas in 2005 (or thereabouts) and there was never another vote.
Germany was bombed to bits; and there was no outcry in Britain. War is as much war now as then. Same in Ukraine, which is trying to defend itself.
Bleating about the civilian casualties in Gaza suggests a bias towards the the Gazans, whose plight is entirely down to the actions of Hamas.
Virtue signalling for a ceasefire is pointless; Israel has to defend itself and they will decide whether or not a ceasefire is to happen.
And remember, 100,00 Gaza sympathisers took to the streets, many of them calling for the obliteration of Israel and the Jews. Hitler tried that and many civilian casualties later, he was defeated.
|
"Bleating about civilians" isn't a bias.
I'd say there's a major difference between a terror group numbering the small tens of thousands people in a controlled territory and Nazi Germany - which at it's peak covered about an area of Europe comprising 280 million people and all the industrial capabilities that come with.
Hamas are tiny opportunists by comparison.
The elections are a complete red herring and no justification for the killing of civilians - which it seems somewhat to be implied.