21-10-2023, 23:00
|
#1144
|
Wisdom & truth
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: RG41
Services: RG41: 1Gig VOLT
Rutland: Gigaclear 400/400
Posts: 12,459
|
Re: The Chronicles of Rishi
Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99
Everybody, gather round and read Seph's previous post to understand the detail of how the global, pan-tax jurisdiction, corporate capitalist market works and the intricacies of arcane financial instruments. You're a funny man
I never mentioned '£100K bods' so not sure where you got that from. As to leaving and taking their jobs with them, your Brexit put paid to most of that.
Finally, for such a financial guru, you would think that when we are discussing effective tax rates, it is blindingly obvious we are discussing the tax rate applied to gross income/wealth gains.
---------- Post added at 21:06 ---------- Previous post was at 21:01 ----------
Again, I never mentioned people paying 45% tax rate. Classic deflection from addressing the point I made.
I also like the idea of people being wealthy e.g. I like myself. I am not saying that middle income earners are to be impacted. Please stop making up BS.
I'll ask the question again:
|
Quote:
Let's take this example: your wealth increases each year by £60k, principally through income, and you pay an overall effective tax rate of, say, 35%. Let's then say that my wealth increases by £100m each year but my overall effective tax rate is 10% or less. Do you think this is fair & equitable?
|
Quote:
I never mentioned '£100K bods' so not sure where you got that from. As to leaving and taking their jobs with them, your Brexit put paid to most of that.
|
You're splitting hairs here. What you have avoided explaining is what the heck you meant by this £60m/£100m 'example'.
Quote:
Again, I never mentioned people paying 45% tax rate. Classic deflection from addressing the point I made.
|
You don't have to have mentioned the 45% tax rate for me to introduce it into the conversation. You go on about the tax gap between the £60m bod and the £100m bod. The only inference to be drawn is that you wish the richer person to be subject to a higher tax rate, or a wealth tax, or something because you never defined the £60m/£100m wealth increase.
Quote:
... it is blindingly obvious we are discussing the tax rate applied to gross income/wealth gains.
|
You mentioned an effective tax rate (I now assume CGT) of 10% for the £100m bod. Where does that come from?
__________________
Seph.
My advice is at your risk.
|
|
|