View Single Post
Old 21-10-2023, 21:06   #1142
ianch99
cf.mega poster
 
ianch99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,725
ianch99 is cast in bronzeianch99 is cast in bronzeianch99 is cast in bronzeianch99 is cast in bronze
ianch99 is cast in bronzeianch99 is cast in bronzeianch99 is cast in bronzeianch99 is cast in bronze
Re: The Chronicles of Rishi

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth View Post

All that 'most people' you mentioned need to do is to read my previous post. Then they'll understand how it all works.

If those '£100K' bods are overtaxed, they'll leave and take the jobs they employ with them. I suggest you join the dots.

As to effective tax rates, I didn't understand your calculation by reason of the cumulative increase you cited. What did you mean by 'your wealth increasing by £60K (or £100K) per year'? After tax? After spending? What is the taxable salary within those figures?
Everybody, gather round and read Seph's previous post to understand the detail of how the global, pan-tax jurisdiction, corporate capitalist market works and the intricacies of arcane financial instruments. You're a funny man

I never mentioned '£100K bods' so not sure where you got that from. As to leaving and taking their jobs with them, your Brexit put paid to most of that.

Finally, for such a financial guru, you would think that when we are discussing effective tax rates, it is blindingly obvious we are discussing the tax rate applied to gross income/wealth gains.

---------- Post added at 21:06 ---------- Previous post was at 21:01 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth View Post
Ah - but Ian kept it vague as to what he meant by wealth growing by £100K/year. So there's no real reference point.

Ian doesn't like the idea of people being wealthy and only paying a top rate of 45% tax. If those people have their tax increased, they'll leave, imo. The wealthy may well have big business here and I have no doubt that they would move those business to a lower taxation country.
Again, I never mentioned people paying 45% tax rate. Classic deflection from addressing the point I made.

I also like the idea of people being wealthy e.g. I like myself. I am not saying that middle income earners are to be impacted. Please stop making up BS.

I'll ask the question again:

Quote:
Let's take this example: your wealth increases each year by £60k, principally through income, and you pay an overall effective tax rate of, say, 35%. Let's then say that my wealth increases by £100m each year but my overall effective tax rate is 10% or less. Do you think this is fair & equitable?
__________________
Unifi UCG Ultra + Unifi APs | VM 1Gbps
ianch99 is offline