Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
Your approach almost guarantees a Hamas win. Which begs the question. whose side are you on?
10 out of 10. Tell me what other deductions you can deduce.. I’m all ears…
Notice how they are talking about the ‘immediate’ impact?
Why are you supporting the Hamas narrative? Do you really think that with a beer in a pub with these nice guys, you can win an argument over a few pints?
You really are delusional if you believe that we can ever come to an agreement with these monsters. They need to be eliminated.
Agreed. A rather curious remark. Too many beers, perhaps.
It’s curious how little you say about Hamas.
If the aim is to root out Hamas (as opposed to punishing civilians) then it is not a war crime. Sorry to burst your bubble.
|
War crimes aren’t defined by intent, sorry to burst yours!
How much, or how little, I say about Hamas is irrelevant.
- Friday night
- 1 am
- Implying Andrew might be on the “wrong side”
- Calling Hugh deluded and accusing him of following a Hamas “narrative”
- Defining war crimes incorrectly
- Taking 20 mins to form an incoherent post.
Something something beers perhaps?