View Single Post
Old 11-10-2023, 17:54   #58
Damien
Remoaner
Cable Forum Team
 
Damien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,864
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Re: HS2 and the future of British railways

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
It’s like when Man Utd or City make a bid for a lower league player, you can add another zero to the price tag.

Government projects = government money = taking the piss.

If it was a private investment scheme there would be more accountability and it would come in closer to budget.

But you would never get private investment in HS2 because it would never return on its investment because it was never needed.
One of the problems according to the people who did HS1 was that the budget was announced so companies tendering had an idea of how much they could fleece the government for.

As for private investment, that's why the Government should do private infrastructure projects. If you evaluate each single project on how much return on investment you'll get from that specific project then nothing with the long-term in mind would ever get built.
Damien is offline   Reply With Quote