| 
				
				Re: HS2 and the future of British railways
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by OLD BOY  There must be a reason why this has gone so badly wrong. The government put up the money and agreed the project, but it’s the civil servants whose responsibility it is to get the specification for the contract right and to set performance measures, and it is also their job to ensure those performance measures (which will include monitoring costs and the progress of the project) are met. This is what appears to have gone badly wrong.
 Clearly, if the government changes requirements during the rollout of the project, any additional costs associated with that will be down to them, but those additional costs should be picked up and factored in. The shambles that we are seeing here are replicated in all the contract specifications and performance monitoring in the privatised industries. We should be employing people who actually understand what the hell they are doing when it comes to contract management.
 |  One small problem with your thesis re "civil servants" - High Speed Two (HS2) Limited is the company responsible for developing and promoting the UK’s new high speed rail network. It is funded by grant-in-aid from the government.
 
HS2 Ltd is an executive non-departmental public body; it's run by these people , none of whom are Civil Servants...
		 
				__________________Thank you for calling the Abyss.
 If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void,  or press 2 to begin your stare.
 If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
 |