Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
In your ritual attempt to take OB down, you missed this conclusion on page 11 of the report:
The experts involved with this study were: Air Pollution/Quality Dons, E., Temmerman, P., van Poppel, M., Bellemans, T., Wets, G., Panis, L. 2013. Street characteristics and traffic factors determining road users’ exposure to black carbon, Science of the Total Environment, 447: pp. 72-79.
OB was making just this point.
|
OB asked a question
Quote:
You may believe that, but if you recall, I responded:
‘I’d love to know how they worked that out. Did they carry out an experiment?’
|
I replied
I’m not sure how answering a question with a link and the page number within that document can be seen as a "ritual attempt to take someone down"
However, in response to your comment re that link, can I point out you may have missed the info in this link I posted at 16:37 today, two hours before your post - this was the source for the information in first post.
https://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/downloa...issions-report
Your <snip>
a) quoted incorrect sources (the sources you quoted were for the study above the one you provided a <snip> from)
b) missed out the first conclusion, such stated "It would be incorrect to assume a 20MPH speed restriction would be detrimental to ambient air quality, as the effect on vehicle emissions are mixed", the fourth conclusion "it is accepted that lower speed limits impacts on brake and tyre wear emissions resulting in lower demand for power at lower speeds which is likely to be beneficial to emissions of this type", and also the supporting commentary in the second paragraph.
Original document for completeness
https://www.gov.wales/sites/default/...qyReyJ0_8gzM0Q