Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
The straightforward question being avoided by Mick is whether it’s acceptable, on a supposedly credible news broadcast, for a man to speculate on whether he or any other man would have sex with a woman.
Is this really one of the supposed greatest thinkers of right wing politics?
Everything else is irrelevant.
|
If you’re asking me if I agree with Lozza’s comments, I don’t, I am just pointing out the rank hypocrisy that exists in this thread, other broadcasters abysmal failings, but GBNews bad.
---------- Post added at 18:05 ---------- Previous post was at 18:00 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
That’s not the point at all. That’s ‘whataboutery’ - trying to dodge the point by moving the debate onto something else.
Laurence Fox’s behaviour was objectively wrong. Dan Wooton’s behaviour was objectively wrong. A news programme employing a card-carrying, office-holding member of the Conservative Party to interview a Conservative government minister is objectively wrong. Nothing the BBC has ever done makes it right.
|
Wrong. Hiding a nonce should have seen the end off the BBC or the law requiring a license to watch TV.
If it’s ‘whataboutery’ then so be it.