[Pierre]

Originally Posted by ianch99

You said there was no consensus, you lied.

You do know what consensus means …..don’t you.

Definitions of consensus. agreement in the judgment or opinion reached by a group as a whole.

The “whole” scientific community does not agree, and you have to posit the question in any event.


I have been clear from the outset, I have not ever denied that the climate is changing. I have, however, refuted that there is an emergency and believe net-zero is a folly.

So you have determined:

"My research also showed me that there is no “emergency”"

This must be compelling research, can you share it here?

Well read these, then we can talk.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/False-Alarm...c=1&th=1&psc=1

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Apocalypse-...a-919059650281

Thanks for the insults, much appreciated.

and at no extra charge!

I am not sure how proving you are lying is virtue signalling? Seems more of a public service to me

You’ve ignored/ deflected the question at least three times now. So I’ll try again, not holding my breath:

(PS your link about India, isn’t what you think it is, if you actually read it)

Again: Ian, are you going to advise the people of: Africa, India and much of Asia, South America this revelation? Otherwise it’s you and your virtue signalling mates against 7 billion people………I already know who wins.

And by the above, I mean that all those nations and parts of the planet, must……..by your measure…….also participate in net zero. Otherwise what’s the point?