Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
Well what a waste of time that was….for you.
I don’t intend to waste mine, I’ve already done my own research. My research showed the climate is changing..duh.
My research also showed me that there is no “emergency”, there is no climate “boiling” and that money spent on hair brained schemes like “net-zero” would be better spent lifting people out of poverty. So that they think less about how they can feed their family, to not thinking about that, and being able to think about the environment.
Sorry Paul, Hugh, infractions accepted……..Ian, on this matter……… you are a gigantic cockhead.
Ian, are you going to advise the people of: Africa, India and much of Asia, South America this revelation? Otherwise it’s you and your virtue signalling mates against 7 billion people………I already know who wins.
|
You said there was no consensus, you lied.
So you have determined:
"My research also showed me that there is no “emergency”"
This must be compelling research, can you share it here?
---------- Post added at 18:05 ---------- Previous post was at 17:59 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
Well what a waste of time that was….for you.
I don’t intend to waste mine, I’ve already done my own research. My research showed the climate is changing..duh.
My research also showed me that there is no “emergency”, there is no climate “boiling” and that money spent on hair brained schemes like “net-zero” would be better spent lifting people out of poverty globally. So that they think less about how they can feed their family, to not thinking about that, and being able to think about the environment.
Sorry Paul, Hugh, infractions accepted……..Ian, on this matter……… you are a gigantic cockhead.
Ian, are you going to advise the people of: Africa, India and much of Asia, South America this revelation? Otherwise it’s you and your virtue signalling mates against 7 billion people………I already know who wins.
|
Thanks for the insults, much appreciated.
I am not sure how proving you are lying is virtue signalling? Seems more of a public service to me
Again, for lazy amongst us:
https://theconversation.com/a-tale-o...matters-188865
Quote:
India’s 2030 climate targets
India’s new climate commitments include two primary targets for 2030. One is to reduce emissions per unit of gross domestic product, or GDP, by 45%, relative to the year 2005. The other is to increase “non-fossil” electricity – solar, wind, nuclear and hydropower – to half of the country’s electricity capacity.
While these targets are an improvement over India’s commitments when it joined the Paris climate agreement in 2015, they are largely a continuation of the country’s “business-as-usual” emissions trajectory. A fast-growing country can reduce its emissions per GDP and increase its emissions.
Views differ on whether this is acceptable. There is considerable debate around what each country’s “fair share” of the global carbon budget is, given industrialized countries’ significantly larger contribution to per capita and cumulative greenhouse emissions.
|