[Sephiroth]

Originally Posted by ianch99

Ah but is it Old Seph? He would provided objective proof and reasoned argument why Climate Change is not a clear and present danger.

This prompts the wider, more fundamental question: why is it that intelligent people do not agree with the overwhelming scientific consensus? Is it that:

a) the overwhelming scientific consensus is wrong. In this case, the evidence that persuaded them he consensus is wrong is easily put forward. Of course, the next question is that why this clear, authoritative evidence has not convinced the people who dedicated their lives to this science?

b) they are fearful of being personally less wealthy if we address the issue

c) <insert excuse here>

Au contraire. The climate change is a clear & present danger. It was going to happen anyway

Btw, your second paragraph is irrelevant political dogma.
.