View Single Post
Old 12-08-2023, 00:13   #872
Pierre
Permanently Banned
 
Pierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 13,332
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Re: The Chronicles of Rishi

Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99 View Post
The net increase of wealth should be taxed. I don't care what state of sublimation their assets are in.
You mean a capital gains tax? We have something like that, it’s called capital gains tax.

Quote:
In the same way that HMRC does not care where you money is when they send you a tax bill.
I totally agree that the HMRC always go after the easy guy. I’ve been through this myself.

I would urge anyone, that hits the 40% bracket, to employ the services of a financial advisor/tax consultant. They’re not that expensive and future you will get down on their knees and thank you.

There are a multitude of ways to avoid paying too much tax and maximising your capital.


Quote:
Riddle me this: what would you prefer?

- the ultra wealthy keep their billions
well if they’ve made it that’s up to them. I would hope they’re philanthropists, as many are.

or

Quote:
part of their increasing wealth is used to improve your local services e.g. GPs, Hospitals, Care Homes, Council services, Libraries, Youth services, etc.
It already is, through tax.
Pierre is offline