Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
The question was in or out, regardless of any other consequence
|
Here is the essential point in the whole clown show. Thank you Pierre.
In a sane world, the politicians who wished to change the macro economic & societal dna of a G7 country, would bring to the table a cogent plan, providing coherent reasoning why this was good idea for the population as a whole.
Yet, as Pierre has so eloquently pointed out, they did none of this. All they focussed on is trying to persuade sufficient floating voters to get over a very low bar. This they did by promising no downside and a lot of upside. They lied ... and here we are, with the diehards now claiming it was not the project's fault but rather the (flawed) implementation.
You see for those who always saw this as a holy, religious crusade, the facts & evidence cannot matter. It is the fundamental definition of faith.