View Single Post
Old 20-07-2023, 11:51   #237
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,268
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: The Bank of Farage

Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking View Post
And all the other pages in the document? If that was the case, why the need for all the other pages filled with biased nonsense? They closed his account, there and then, not at some point in the future. Even then, the sensible business decision would be to warn somebody that they were at risk of no longer being eligible, so they had the chance to be prepared to move accounts or perhaps to pay more into the account in order to still qualify.
It was a review aimed at a PERSON, not an account. How was that PERSON selected for review in the first place?
He was given notice his accounts were being closed. They weren't closed in November 2022.

Just because you're a Farage Fan and don't agree with Coutts' analysis does not make it biased nonsense.
He was a poltically-exposed person so would be flagged by software on the bank's CRM taken from PEP lists. Then the bank would monitor his press.
1andrew1 is offline   Reply With Quote