Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees
Ah, so because it was a different time back then that justifies behaviours that occurred. Got it
|
They (and many other publications) did not do anything illegal, or publish underage pictures.
"underage" is defined by Law, and the law back then was 16, just like the Law for some sexual acts was 21, then 18, and now 16.
So yes, it 100% justified "behaviours that occurred" at the time.
The Sun however is now backtracking big time ;
Quote:
The Sun says it didn't intend to suggest Edwards had done anything criminal and won't be publishing further claims about him
|