Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymoss
This is what we know
Hue Edwards is on 430K per year
The Suns story said the person selling the photos was 17
This person now in their 20s says it is rubbish
Now we also know if this person could prove they were 17 the potential earner is absolutely massive. The story, possible court cases. Yet they say the age part is not true.
What does that tell us?
|
Starting at the end, it tells us the youngster hasn’t turned over any evidence to the police that would indicate a crime or made a complaint (in line with their statement). In the absence of either of those there’d be no lawful basis to seize any of HE’s devices. So the police are where they are.
If the 17 year old registered on onlyfans (or a dating app) pretending to be 18 at first contact I’m not sure how that’s potentially a great earner (in court or in the press) for them regardless of when messages became photos. They could prove that they were 17 and their first act was deception. At this point they are an unreliable witness.