View Single Post
Old 04-07-2023, 20:12   #115
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,270
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: The Bank of Farage

Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking View Post
How on earth is he expected to prove any of that? How does he prove that NatWest didn't offer him a business account and before he raised the issue in the press.
If he says Coutts wrote to him with no explanation and no offer of an account at NatWest then show us the letter. These days with mobile phones a redacted letter can be up on Twitter in less than a minute.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking View Post
Still doesn't explain all the other stories of banks cancelling other people.
One vicar who sent a potentially offensive contact form does not make an extensive list of case study material.

If any customer genuinely thinks they have been mistreated then they can contact the Financial Ombudsman. I've yet to see any evidence that this is more than just a couple of snowflakes playing the victim card. They need to put up or shut up. Let's see that vicar's ranty contact form and judge for ourselves whether it was offensive or not.
1andrew1 is online now   Reply With Quote