Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Imagine being so hate filled you complain to the probably minimum wage staff about a pride flag rather than just get on with your day on the premise of live and let live.
Welcome to the culture war.
|
Only permitted opinions allowed then? Who gets to say what is and isn't "permitted"?
What did the banks expect it to achieve? Costly exercise and wasteful of resources.
---------- Post added at 18:51 ---------- Previous post was at 18:49 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
I don't think you've taken on board jfman's point from the other day. There is a world of difference between Farage stating something to be so and it actually being so.
Where is the evidence that:
- He didn't have the assets long before then?
- He was only offered an account at NatWest after the story broke?
- NatWest did not offer him a business account?
Farage needs to put up or shut up.
We don't know that the reasons were unspecified. Again, you're taking his word as gospel. Damien has pointed out that he lied about not knowing Coutts had eligibility criteria so could well have lied about this too. Other private banks have income and asset criteria to Coutts - they're not mass market offerings.
|
How on earth is he expected to prove any of that? How does he prove that NatWest didn't offer him a business account and before he raised the issue in the press.
Still doesn't explain all the other stories of banks cancelling other people.