Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
Yes, critiqued by:……..
No doubt an independent balanced outfit.
That, right there, is a position not based in science in anyway.
Translated as “Even though it might be true we’re overdoing it………….down playing it doesn’t fit our narrative which might be problematic.”
No one is denying Climate Change is real!!!…..
But it is not an Emergency, apocalypse etc etc.
It is manageable without destroying western global civilisations and economies
|
I did look at
Climate Feedback and their process seem fair:
Quote:
Typically, a story will be reviewed for CF by five or six scientists, but on one story there were 17 reviewers. According to Climate Feedback, each reviewer has to hold a PhD in a relevant discipline, and have at least one published article on climate science or climate change impacts in a top-tier peer-reviewed scientific journal within the last three years.[8][9] However, summaries are written by an editor rather than by a reviewer.
The method was called "expert crowdsourcing" or a form of "elevated crowdsourcing" by Poynter's International Fact-Check Network.
|
You seem to be happy that Climate Change exists but as long as it does not cost (you) any money.