Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99
Interesting note about the author of the first book:
|
Yes, critiqued by:……..
Quote:
|
was analyzed by seven academic reviewers and one editor from the Climate Feedback fact-checking project.
|
No doubt an independent balanced outfit.
Quote:
|
While it is useful to push back against claims that climate change will lead to the end of the world or human extinction, to do so by inaccurately downplaying real climate risks is deeply problematic and counterproductive.
|
That, right there, is a position not based in science in anyway.
Translated as “Even though it might be true we’re overdoing it………….down playing it doesn’t fit our narrative which might be problematic.”
Quote:
|
What is interesting is that denying that climate change is real and affecting is a sort of reverse Pascal's wager. You can see that majority scientific consensus concludes that it is real and we face imminent danger yet denial is the option chosen for some. Maybe some can only accept reality when it is present and not pending?
|
No one is denying Climate Change is real!!!…..
But it is not an Emergency, apocalypse etc etc.
It is manageable without destroying western global civilisations and economies