[jfman]

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter

Just to add to the above, the summing upat the end of this programme mirrors some of the comments made in this thread in that it's a shame that the onus will be put onto site operators instead of educating users as to what is('nt) appropriate to post.

Whilst I agree, it's a sad fact that this is unlikely to work. There will certainly be no harm in trying to educate users but, by fault or design, some would continue posting inappropriate text, images, videos etc regardless.

---------- Post added at 08:26 ---------- Previous post was at 08:16 ----------



I understand what you're saying.

With regards to the UK I asked Ofcom if sites were to move abroad and/or use a VPN to circumvent tje new legislation, what would happen then as this would make a mockery of the new requirements.

It seems that they wouldn't go down the proscribing route, instead services that allow any offending website to exist would be dealt with instead, such as site hosting providers, advertisers etc.

If it were not possible to kill a weed, depriving it of light & water would be just as effective.

Deal with them… how?