Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
And what happens when millions of people cancel their internet connections to claim free “necessity internet”?
I knew you’d continue to clutch at straws pushing the needless agenda but I didn’t think you’d resort to Corbynism as the answer to achieve it.
A multi-billion pound answer as a solution to a problem we invent. 
|
It’s not my idea or solution. I merely pointed out what was being considered.
---------- Post added at 23:50 ---------- Previous post was at 23:48 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
I’m curious, though pleased, that you’re so willing to undermine your own argument in this way. This point was sourced at the time, and is easy to source now as plenty of research is ongoing.
Electricity usage by information technologies was around 2,000 terawatt-hours in 2010; by most estimates it will exceed 8,000 terawatt-hours by the end of this decade. That’s around 20% of global electricity consumption. The worst case estimate is up to 50%.
If you think that driving TV broadcast infrastructure onto data networks won’t have a significant impact on the national grid, I’d love some of what you’re smoking.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...14629618301051
I wish you would.
|
The point I was making was that you were putting forward a reason why extensive streaming couldn’t happen. I know you sourced the article, but as usual you just cannot see that these problems can be overcome.
And, of course, we are overcoming it, aren’t we?