Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Ultimately, for unionists corruption has always been (and always will) be at the core of their politics. The fact it’s the SNP makes it novel.
Tory corruption will be the useful shield given that’s at taxpayers expense at far greater quantity. So while Chris enjoys the echo chamber of the state broadcaster and unionist chip papers it’s far from certain the extent it will resonate meaningfully in the medium to long term with the independence supporting electorate who long gave up on the dying media that symbolises the union so well.
That said, to defend Chris, some of this pantomime is objectively funny.
|
I don't disagree that it is a clown show but the serious subject of Executive corruption shouldn't just based on your tribal preferences. If you are going to bang on about how bad the SNP corruption is, then be objective and be consistent. That is all I am saying.
Also, the constant use of the playground taunts e.g. Hamza Useless (or whatever) just cheapens the debate. YMMV
---------- Post added at 13:13 ---------- Previous post was at 13:10 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
The one thing has nothing to do with the other.
It may be that more than one party deserves trashing. But it is not invalid for Chris to trash the SNP.
Of course, the SNP is trashing itself or do you not agree?
|
I am not saying it is. I am saying be consistent and be proportionate. I mean, funnelling 100's of millions to your mates is not in the same league as secretly buying a caravan with Party funds
