Thread: Coronavirus
View Single Post
Old 30-12-2022, 21:06   #2347
nffc
cf.mega poster
 
nffc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chavvy Nottingham
Age: 41
Services: Freeview, Sky+, 100 Mb/s VM BB, mega i7 PC, iPhone 13, Macbook Air
Posts: 7,449
nffc has a nice shiny star
nffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny star
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman View Post
Requiring a negative test might pass the reasonable test but it fails the effectiveness test in the absence of a joined up response to manage a pandemic. If the latter isn’t required then why impose the former. The next variant to provoke a wave in the UK will already be in the system at low levels rising as the current variants fall. The absence of testing on any meaningful level guarantees this.

The one after that could come from anywhere. The reality is a “concerning variant” will be embedded in the UK population before it hits any triggers (hospitalisations/deaths). Before that point the line will be we have widespread immunity.
So what would your proposed plan be to deal with the infections half way around the world then?
__________________


nffc is offline   Reply With Quote