Thread: Coronavirus
View Single Post
Old 17-12-2022, 15:35   #2306
Ramrod
[NTHW] pc clan
 
Ramrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tonbridge
Age: 58
Services: Amazon Prime Video & Netflix. Deregistered from my TV licence.
Posts: 21,960
Ramrod has a golden aura
Ramrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden aura
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ms NTL View Post
Please have a look here

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_a...cal_Toxicology

See section controversies

"In 2022, after a call from the editor for articles on alleged adverse effects of the Covid-19 vaccine,[7] Seneff et al. published a paper alleging various mechanisms for various diseases that the authors intend to link to Covid-19 vaccination.[8] Several scientists have warned of the biases and shortcomings that this article contains.[9][10][11][12]"
Thank you for the link. I have.
A few problems with it:
Link 9 points at the same wikipedia page. Finding the actual page, it turns out that it simply to a blog post

Link 10 leads to factcheck.org which
a) Starts off by stating "Large, randomized controlled trials and a substantial body of real-world data support the effectiveness and safety of the vaccines"....which is, if you look at the original Pfizer data that they tried to suppress for 50 years, an outright lie.
b) looking around the site at subjects that I am very knowledgeable about, they are not above using incorrect and/or dodgy sources and data.

Link 11 Is simply an opinion piece on a site called sciencebasedmedicine.org. btw, that site is run by New England Skeptical Society whose 5 million/yr funding proports to come from 'donations'. Interestingly, it seems that they got shut down a few years ago by the IRS for not reporting their income for 3 years running. Make of that what you will.

Link 12 points at an article wherein it's authors lament how they tried to get their paper published but "We report here our request to the editor of FCT to have our rebuttal published, unfortunately rejected after three rounds of reviewing."....so the rebuttal wasn't good enough to be published.
Ramrod is offline   Reply With Quote