Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramrod
You said:
I said: So...I didn't insult you.
edit: What accusations am I making that you are upset about?
btw.....Chris called me a quack....that's an insult. I'm insulted now. Care to comment?
|
You’re being alarmist and you know it. ‘Peer reviewed’ is not the same as ‘correct’ or ‘consensus’. It means it has been competently produced. Again, you know this.
I have less issue with the limitations of a ‘survey of surveys’, which is what this study is, than I do with the headline you chose to put on it. You’re obviously pursuing an agenda. I don’t need to read the entire research paper to know that.
And yes, I could if I was so motivated. While neither of my degrees are in the sciences, I believe I’m competent to read and evaluate the material adequately well.