Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
Well, Twitter defined and policed it. They did/do so primarily concerned about their appeal to advertisers and users. I imagine they'll probably do the same now.
For all the fuss about these e-mails what they show is that it was Twitter making the decisions as a private company. If they get those decisions wrong it will hurt the company. We can complain about those moderation decisions and advertisers can make those decisions costly/profitable.
Really what else do people want to happen here? Musk can now do what he wants with it.
|
There in lies the essence of the problem. One man, due to his huge personal wealth, can dictate the policy of a platform used by millions of people the world over. That is the definition of the exact opposite of free speech. Pandering to the whims & diktats of a preening narcissist will only lead to trouble.