Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
My position is that, Tory MPs may view Sunak as the least worst. I’m not so sure that those who elected Boris in the first instance will.
I would prefer neither. I think a vote for either is a backward move. My initial ire was the proposition that Sunak was morally superior than Johnson, and that’s simply not the case.
I don’t know where they go, preferably without either Johnson or Sunak. But if I was offered only Sunak and Johnson…………it would be Johnson.
|
Let's put it another way. Johnson is morally inferior to Sunak. For evidence of this, look no further than how he dealt with the Chris Pincher and Owen Paterson situations turning them into scandals, placing justice and the country into second place.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Pincher_scandal
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/explainers-59147044
---------- Post added at 10:35 ---------- Previous post was at 10:32 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
If the online sources are to be believed there's a massive difference between
a) MPs who hold posts within the party (massively Johnson)
b) the rest of the MPs (not Johnson, probably Sunak)
c) the membership (heavily Johnson)
d) Conservative voters (lean Johnson?)
e) the population at large (not Johnson)
|
The membership has form!
If Johnson has 100+ MPs backing him, how come we don't know their names when we know Sunak's supporters' names?