Quote:
Originally Posted by spiderplant
So how many is it
|
Enough to surprise me and others
Quote:
Originally Posted by spiderplant
why does that surprise you?
|
Considering how very small the amount of transgender or gender confused people there are, the amount of people choosing baby names based on such a minimal percentage is not relational in any way at all. It makes no sense to do so. Unless you want to show off to friends, much in the way many middle class peeps rescue a dog from Greece or abroad instead if locally so they have a story to tell their friends about how good they are. Only a few people do this for genuine reasons.
Quote:
Originally Posted by spiderplant
How many did you expect?
|
Not as many. An unsurprising amount.
---------- Post added at 22:09 ---------- Previous post was at 22:04 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ
On my email signature at work I have “(he/him)” after my name. Virtue signalling? Do me a favour. I do it so anyone I correspond with (in my workplace or externally) who feels unsure about revealing their chosen pronoun (hopefully) will feel a little more open and relaxed whilst dealing with me.
Is there a problem with this?
|
You are doing it for a reason that may not exist. How many people do you communicate with by email who are trans? Its not necessarily and pandering to the smallest group.
We might as well virtue signal that we support scat lovers in our signature, so they don't think they are reviled by everyone.