Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
Make a sentence, sinking, rats, a, ship, leaving
and there you have it, what they see is opportunism, a chance to boost their careers by being on the winning side, bit like old blunder woman herself actually
|
Such a cynic…
---------- Post added at 20:19 ---------- Previous post was at 20:18 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
i think you're being a bit unfair, Seph. According to polling, she's capable of delivering a Labour victory at the next election.  |
How could anyone, seriously, think that Starmer would make a better PM?
Come on, this isn’t the jokes thread!
---------- Post added at 20:24 ---------- Previous post was at 20:19 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
She may be the better candidate but is still not what I think most Conservatives are looking for.
You ask her a question about what she's doing to help people through the crisis; she trots out the tuppence worth of help she's offering "from day 1". When asked whether or not shell remove the 5% VAT on energy, she pleads that she shouldn't pre-judge the budget. The lying woman knows that her offer "doesn't touch the sides" of the problem (Sunak's words) but she's so desperate to be PM that she doesn't care that her offer is valueless - she knows it's valueless.
We can see what she's made of.
|
You’re wrong on that. It is a general principle that you don’t talk about what is in the budget in advance because people take advantage of that knowledge. She is simply sticking to that principle.
The Civil Servants have been instructed to work up options to deal with this energy bill crisis and when she is in office, she will review that and make a decision.
You should at least give her a chance, Seph. You are getting as cynical and downbeat as the socialist-minded posters on here! Please don’t encourage them, it is extremely depressing to hear all this negative nonsense.