Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
You as well, you need to wind your neck in too, I do not give a stuff about Trump, if he’s broke the law, fine, the book gets thrown at him, but we have a historical precedent of the law not being applied in such cases, & that matters, the law is the law, you cannot selectively let someone off for the same kind of violations on safe storage and use of classified material, Clinton was.
|
For someone who doesn’t give a stuff about Trump you seem quite vocal to argue his cause, or the Republican cause, in most threads that he gets a reference. Plus narrowly give the thread a remit where Trump’s past questionable activity is out of scope but years of dirt on the Democrats, or Clinton, are fair game.
If there was a thread to slate the Democrats I’d be near the front of the queue. As in the UK I don’t think parties of the left/centre left/centre should set their barometer at being slightly less shit and/or corrupt than the right wing party.
The law should never be selectively applied, but we all know in the real world the rich/famous/powerful get away with things the rest of us wouldn’t because of who, or what, they know. The USA likes to sell itself as the world’s moral policeman but it’s no less corrupt than many dictatorships in the developing world. Half of which they probably installed.