View Single Post
Old 05-07-2022, 14:20   #4231
mrmistoffelees
067
 
mrmistoffelees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Middlesbrough
Age: 49
Services: Many
Posts: 5,074
mrmistoffelees has a nice shiny star
mrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny star
Re: Britain outside the EU

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth View Post
You ask a very fair question. We had the power not to be able to implement rules set by Brussels whenever we were able to negotiate a derogation/opt-out. In the case of the WTD, which switched from a vetoable decision to a Health & Safety measure (qualified majority) we were able to negotiate opt-outs. I remind that the WTD was one of France's pet project to bring everyone down to their ridiculous working practices.

But, and this is the big BUT, the path toward federalisation is/was the big worry for me - the EU Parliament would trump ours. The Tories would always have vetoed this, but the creeping powers being sought by the Commission would have ultimately led to a trade-off with the UK government. For example, the UK might have agreed to a particular competence to be given to the Commission in exchange for meaningful changes to the CAP (Blair got such a commitment which France then frustrated); or in exchange for a bigger rebate (ha ha).
again, genuine question, It strikes me had we acted a bit more 'french' in our dealings with Brussels we may have been able to achieve/get more?
__________________
Nerves of steel, heart of gold, knob of butter......
mrmistoffelees is offline   Reply With Quote