Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
Are you suggesting that it would have been better to remain in the EU because of the true size of the divorce bill?
All I see here from you is sour grapes. We are well rid of being subject to Brussels' rules.
|
Pure deflection. I am pointing out one of the pure unadulterated lies made during the campaign. Let's focus on what was promised and what is reality.
You aim to conjure up a childish name calling game when, in all seriousness, this is the fate of the country we are talking about. You can call names in the playground or debate how we mitigate the devastating effects of this catastrophic decision.
---------- Post added at 23:05 ---------- Previous post was at 23:04 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
But that was money we owed. Have you forgotten that £100m+ that remainers said we would end up paying?
|
Again pure deflection. We have reality and we have OB's version ...
---------- Post added at 23:06 ---------- Previous post was at 23:05 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
As I've consistently said, freedom from rules made in Brussels, usually to suit the French, with wheezes like the WTD being perpetrated to combat the UK veto - that's what's important. The GDP dip will be recovered - that's what business does.
So it's not about "which rules we should stop following". It's about sovereignty and the freedom to choose the rules to which we will be bound.
|
Said like a true follower. You know those who frequently "say it was all sovereignty and I'd pay any price" are those who can well afford to do so.