Thread: Coronavirus
View Single Post
Old 03-07-2022, 08:18   #2000
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,268
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman View Post
They’ll perceive their own plan as more economically sustainable.

As much as some pretend we can go back to 2019 the “work from home” workforce aren’t going back to offices en masse with waves every 3-4 months. That creates sub-optimal economic outcomes that aren’t sustainable for us, but nobody wants to wake up to the reality. This drags out the pain because actually “living with the virus” is more than a buzz phrase used by politicians.
Why is it not sustainable for us to have a work from home workforce? My perception is that most large offices are on a hybrid model. Thursday night is the new Friday and city centre pubs and restaurants on Fridays are now full of tourists.
1andrew1 is offline   Reply With Quote