Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
Did this trial use evidence that wasn't applied in the UK one? The UK one was solely about what he did or didn't do, whereas this one was about both of them.
IMO the UK decision was wrong on the basis that the evidence presented wasn't known at the time of the alleged defamation.
|
it is not alleged anymore
---------- Post added at 18:28 ---------- Previous post was at 18:27 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itshim
So British court got it wrong . Both can't be right , must trust jury over a trained judge . After all pulling down a statue ( whom ever it is) is not criminal damage according to a British jury .  |
I would go with a jury over a judge yes
On your logic a biased jury would tend to side with the women wouldn't they? isn't it normally men who are vilified in such cases. The evidence presented in court left me in no doubt Heard was lying and the psychiatric reports explained why she is the way she is. A lot of the evidence was not allowed by the judge in the UK trial if it had been there may well have been a different result
End of the day the only witness Heard had to any assault was her sister and Depp had plenty of witnesses that said differently ie hotel staff who were there at the time of alleged assaults bartenders first responders and on top of that Kate Moss who basically disproved one of the lies outright