Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
I agree but the point is Starmer being under investigation isn't that relevant to my criticism of Johnson. I said Starmer should resign if he is fined and I think Johnson should have resigned for the same reasons (and lying to Parliament).
|
I don’t think either of them should resign, a stupid law was created for essentially, what was a bad cold, bad colds can still kill, we don’t make stupid laws that infringe on our freedoms, to contain and stop the spread of said bad colds.
Johnson is a liar, I’ve never disputed this and I have also stated, he’s not my choice for PM. I wouldn’t care if he went tomorrow.
But equally, Starmer is also a liar and terrible one at that. But the lying and the scheming, attempt to cover up the shenanigans at Miners hall, it’s not good enough at all from Labour.
---------- Post added at 16:56 ---------- Previous post was at 16:52 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Indeed, it's whataboutery. It's also - at this stage - a hypothetical. Unlike with Johnson who has been fined.
|
Sod off with the whataboutery bullshit, when it was all hypothetical for Johnson, Starmer insisted Johnson should resign, Starmer will only go now, if he is fined, it’s double standards and ridiculous hypocrisy from the likes of you.
