Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
I've been saying for months now he's either too untruthful or too incompetent to be PM. This does not alter the analysis.
|
I think the PM had some serious stuff to deal with and was unaware of what was going on behind his back.
Thus far, he has received a fine because a cake arrived in the room where he had arrived for a meeting. Let’s see what else transpires before we start judging him against Cummings’ allegations.
---------- Post added at 10:12 ---------- Previous post was at 10:10 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maggy
Doesn't matter.The fact that so many of the public FOLLOWED the rules and were asked not to do certain things like hold funerals or say goodbye to dying family members will rankle for generations. Those that got fined unnecessarily will be annoyed and remember for a very long time how those who made the rules apparently had trouble in applying them to their own circumstances.
They were the ones who made the laws so it should have been made much clearer what was and what was not allowed.
|
I don’t think that the rule makers ever thought that a cake on its own represented a social event. The Met have got it wrong.
---------- Post added at 10:17 ---------- Previous post was at 10:12 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
Innocent until fined. 
|
You must have a lot of faith in the police to say that. A court is the judge of whether or not you are innocent and I have no doubt they would come to a different conclusion on the cake incident.
BJ may still be found to have breached the law in relation to other incidents still to be judged, but it would be jumping the gun to accuse him of blatantly and deliberately breaking the rules as some have claimed.