Mick

More bollocks from you. You would make a lousy detective Andrew.

This goes to show how terrible you are at your "Starmer is innocent", narrative.

A few days ago, you said:

An investigation is now taking police, you can wipe that egg off your face now.

If by your own words, police didn't think there was any "meat" on this *beergate* bone, why have they had to re-open an investigation?

If you go off your narrative that it's just one witness against a whole group of lockdown rule breakers, which is what they are, then why have they decided to re-investigate this?

It's because it is so obvious.

The sheer amount of lies told to cover this up by Labour and Starmer.

Key issues which you seem to want to rubbish but do actually matter.

Initially they said Rayner was not there, but then they said she was and that not admitting to this previously was a honest mistake. It also shows on the memo that AR was included/invited in on this event. (This is a Labour LIE)

Starmer said there was no food available anywhere when in fact his own hotel and other restaurants and cafes were open and providing takeway services only. That they stopped to eat was a "spontaneous" decision made when they realised they were all hungry. (Another LIE) and its a lie because the Memo shows the the curry was a planned event.

Starmer's claim that they were working, stopped to eat and then went back to work, doesn't hold water, he is seen in leaked footage, holding a beer, with several other people in shot, no social distancing and no mask wearing. You are not working when you're in a group of people drinking beer, I do not give a shit what anyone else says.

This witness says there were many there not working at all and were there just to socialise, if this is the case, Starmer had a responsibility to interject and ask people to leave who were not working at all as they could be in breach of lockdown rules he himself voted for in Parliament.