Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
Does it make a difference if it was planned? His claim isn't that he was surprised by a takeaway but they had one when working. The fact it's part of an official campaigning schedule adds more weight to the idea it was working and not a party.
|
Yes it does, because it catches Labour in yet another lie, they said the curry wasn’t planned. Also Damien, you’re missing the massive rule breaking. You couldn’t eat or share food with people you were not household members with.
You’re not working when your drinking beer. None of them are wearing masks in the footage or social distancing.
Anyway Sunday Times has come out with their own story:
The Sunday Times has a Labour source present at the Durham party who confirms NO work was done after the curry and beer, as per Mail on Sunday's leaked op note.:
Quote:
Crucially, the source said Starmer did not go back to work after eating his curry and being filmed drinking beer. “There was no work done after the curry,” they said. “It has been claimed that Starmer worked during the curry and then after the curry. None of those two things happened. He did not go back to work to the best of my knowledge.”
They also accused some attendees, including Foy and her staff, of not working at all and only being there to socialise.
|
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/w...laim-6pc05gnn2
Dan Hodges:
“As we also reported. Keir Starmer's position is becoming increasingly untenable this evening.”