Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
Starmer's meal and beer took place at a different time and different set of rules than Johnson and he has been cleared. If there was any meat on the bones of this story, an investigation would be taking place.
|
I think you are lacking in skills when it comes to the law and what can and cannot happen in an investigation - it can be reopened when new evidence comes to light and it has, first we had the LIES that Angela Rayner was not there but then she was, now we have details of about 30 people being there, all eating and drinking beer which they should not have been doing as it was against the rules - you being obtuse and pathetic about Starmer being cleared does not cut it, the event can be re-investigated any time.
The rules were explicit and obvious:
No meeting indoors of any kind, even during campaigning unless for working purposes, when Starmer is holding a beer and is seen in footage talking to several people in a room, he is not working, that is a social gathering.
No food to be shared amongst people, you are not households with. If you are having a takeaway with 30 people and drinking beer, it's a an egregious breach of the rules that were in place.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
It's theoretically hard for Opposition parties to capitalise on the government's mistakes if people can't recall that Covid rules changed over time, but the polls do seem to be showing that Opposition parties are being successful here. Despite the great efforts by the Mail to come to Johnson's rescue.
|
The mistake here is, you have not got a clue what you're talking about when it comes to breaches of the lockdown rules and are being very politically pathetic and one sided when it comes to who broke the rules and who didn't and who should and who should not be fined.