Originally Posted by chris

none of which addresses the actual issue. This is desperate stuff.

Just admit it - you went out on a limb defending bozzer and he’s let you down. He’s been caught in a piece of sickening hypocrisy which everyone who had to forego a visit to a loved one’s death bed, or cancel a wedding, or hold a funeral without mourners, will find extremely hard to forgive. And all you seem to be worried about is being wrong on the internet.



Deflect, deflect, deflect … hugh gets your faux moralising, i get your faux outrage. Sorry but it won’t wash.

I repeat: This is nothing to do with where this sits on the standard scale of fixed penalty offences. It’s to do with his moral authority to lead at a time of crisis. Unless and until you can adequately answer in those terms, all of this is just hot air from someone who has a very hard time admitting they could ever be wrong about anything.

Originally Posted by pierre

on the big ticket items, he’s called it right. I see no need for him to go.