Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
Didn't stop the Conservatives in 1940, or the Coalition in 1916…
|
Hardly comparable. Churchill was picked to stand up to Hitler, which Chamberlain refused to do, preferring appeasement.
---------- Post added at 20:37 ---------- Previous post was at 20:31 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
Or…
"Sorry, guys - nice thought, but this is against the rules we’ve asked everyone else to follow, and as the people setting the rules, we have to set an example; please return to your desks".
|
You are so perfect, Hugh. Nice to see how you must never do anything that could ever be questioned in your life. So admirable. I think you should be the PM’s personal advisor to guarantee he never gets into trouble again.

---------- Post added at 20:44 ---------- Previous post was at 20:37 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
… and here comes the deflection. I have to admit this is poor even by your standards. You’ve had all afternoon.
The question is one of moral authority, and specifically whether a leader still has it after telling everyone to refrain from certain behaviour for the safety of the nation, then behaving that way themselves.
Does such a leader retain the moral right to govern, or to legislate for our behaviour?
|
Oh, do come off it, Chris. I am merely pointing out that there are degrees of wrongdoing, and this is pretty borderline.
And I haven’t been thinking about this all afternoon. I don’t spend all day on this forum, I do have other things to do in my life.
If that incident was a blatant full-blown party, I would agree that this was a more serious issue, but looking at what actually happened, that puts the matter into proportion.
Those who are out to get him will kick up a huge fuss. But, sorry; it is rather pathetic.